Legal Opinion
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Municipalities of Holdrege
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1950No. 32706PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.
The Chicago, Burlington" & Quincy Railroad Company, a common carrier of passengers and freight in Nebraska and other states, applied to the Nebraska State Railway Commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission, for permission to discontinue motor passenger trains numbered 151 and 152 operated daily except Sunday on the branch line of the railroad betweeen Holdrege, Nebraska, and the Nebraska-Colorado state line. From Holdrege west to the state line dividing the states of Nebraska and Colorado are the following towns and stations: Loomis, Bertrand, Smithfield, El wood, Eustis, Kingston,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Palmer v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mississippi Railroad Commission v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- City of Newton v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Shupe Ex Rel. Shupe v. County of AntelopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Commuters' Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.