Legal Opinion

Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 14363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Motion to dismiss appeal from certain orders and judgments.

This is an action for an accounting. The defendants Swanson and Verdugo Lumber Company answered and cross-complained. A money judgment was entered in their favor. Upon appeal therefrom the plaintiffs Hood filed a stay bond by the terms of which the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company undertook to pay the judgment or any part thereof in the event of an affirmance or a dismissal of the appeal. The District Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, concluded that the trial court had improperly allowed interest prior to judgment. (127 Cal.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Heinlen v. BeansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Chase v. RiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Van Lee Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Grant Memorial Park, Inc. v. Robla School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Stahl v. FahrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API