Legal Opinion

Van Lee Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1932No. Docket No. 981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs brought this action for an injunction and accounting. Defendants all answered and cross-complaints were filed by Verdugo Lumber Company, a corporation, and Emil P. Swanson, doing business under the fictitious firm name and style of Eagle Rock Lumber Company. Judgment was for cross-complainants and plaintiffs and cross-defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs executed and delivered to one Harold L. Shaw a promissory note for $5,000, together with a trust deed securing same, both dated November 3, 1928, for the purpose of enabling Shaw to purchase building materials of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Brovelli v. BianchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hardwood Interior Co. v. BullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. MacFarland v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Siebenhauer v. Bank of California National Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API