Heinlen v. Beans
California Supreme Court
' Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
In an action for specific performance, brought by John Heinlen against Calvin Martin and Wayne B. Rogers, judgment was rendered on the 28th of January, 1873, that plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum óf ten thousand dollars, the value of the use and occupation of the land in controversy fr.om the 27th of November, 1868, to the date of the rendition of the judgment; that defendants execute a deed of conveyance of the land above mentioned, and deliver possession thereof to plaintiff, with costs of suit. Defendants in the same case made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. BreyfogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Hurlburd v. BogardusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heinlen v. BeansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Crozier v. Freeman Coal Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Hewlwtt v. BeedeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Cobb v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.