Landmark Tower Assoc. v. First Nat. Bank of Chicago
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
This cause came on for consideration upon the petition of defendant for removal; upon the motion of defendant to dismiss for lack of venue; and upon the motion of defendant to dismiss. The court, having considered the record and being fully advised in the premises, finds and concludes that the motion to dismiss for lack of venue should be denied and that the petition for removal and the motion to dismiss should be granted.
1. Petition for Removal:
In order to determine whether the requirements of removal have been met, this court must determine whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. HozierSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Francisco Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Connecticut National Bank v. IaconoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- In Re First National Bank of Boston, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Franklin v. SHERWOOD PARK, LTD., INCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Evergreen Forest Products of Georgia, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.