Leonard v. Pugh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs first contend the trial court erred in granting the answering defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs argue in support of this contention that the allegations in the complaint are sufficient to state a claim to have the easement across their tract extinguished. We agree.
A complaint is deemed sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6) where no insurmountable bar to recovery appears on the face of the complaint and the complaint’s allegations give adequate notice of the nature and extent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Deitz v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Sparrow v. Dixie Leaf Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Snug Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. CurranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Century Communications, Inc. v. Housing Authority of Wilson & Site, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Harlow v. Voyager Communications VSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Jackson v. CulbrethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Hartwell v. MahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.