Legal Opinion

Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Capital City Furniture, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1970No. 7025SC590PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Appellee has moved in this court that the appeal be dismissed as being premature, contending that the order of Judge McLean is interlocutory rather than final. Assuming without deciding that appellee’s contention is correct, we deem the questions raised sufficiently meritorious to be considered by us at this time, therefore, we treat the purported appeal as a petition for certiorari, allow the petition, and proceed to pass upon the questions presented.

First, we consider the question did the court err in setting aside the default judgment on the ground of excusable neglect as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Engines & Equipment, Inc. v. LipscombCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Harris v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Grier ex rel. Brown v. GuyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Carolina Electric Service of Henderson, Inc. v. GrangerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API