Legal Opinion
Batchelor v. MERCK & CO., INC.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided December 10, 2008No. 3:05 CV 791PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (DE # 57.) Plaintiff Rochelle D. Batchelor has responded to the motion (DE # 76), defendant has replied (DE #78), and plaintiff has filed a sur-reply (DE # 82), after receiving permission to do so from the court (DE # 80; DE # 81). For the reasons explained below, the court grants the motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff worked for defendant as a sales representative in the South Bend, Indiana area, from August 2002 until June 2005. This sales…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Tomanovich, George v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Springer v. McLANE COMPANY, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010