Legal Opinion
Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. City of Syracuse
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 31, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
This is an action in equity, seeking an injunction restraining the city of Syracuse from operating an “apparatus known as a ehlorinator, which it purchased from the Paradon Manufacturing Company. Plaintiff claims that by the operation of the apparatus the city of Syracuse is working a process of antiseptieizing water, covered by United States patent No. 1,142,361, granted to Electro-Bleaching Gas Company, as assignee of, George Ornstein. The suit is based on claims 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 of that patent. Plaintiff is an exclusive licensee under the patent.
Defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1920
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Greenport Sewerage Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Village of Garden CityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1930