Murphy v. Droessler
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
Mark and Jean Murphy appeal from an order dismissing their action to obtain clear title on their newly constructed residence. The trial court granted the counterclaims of Paul Droessler, d/b/a Stoughton Masonry (Droessler), and Conco Concrete Construction, Inc. (Conco) for foreclosure of their construction liens on the property. The issue is whether Droessler and Conco properly served construction lien notices pursuant to § 779.02(2)(b), Stats. We conclude the notices did not meet the statutory requirements because they were not served on the Murphys by registered or certified mail, return…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Yotvat v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Gottsacker Real Estate Co., Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Trojan v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Aluminum Industries Corp. v. Camelot Trails Condominium Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Aluminum Industries Corp. v. Camelot Trails Condominium Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000