Legal Opinion

Seider v. O'CONNELL

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. 98-1223Published

1Opinion of the Court

236 Wis.2d 211 (2000)

2000 WI 76

612 N.W.2d 659

Richard SEIDER and Jean Seider, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Connie O'CONNELL, Commissioner of Insurance, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner.

No. 98-1223.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Oral argument September 8, 1999.

Decided June 30, 2000.

For the defendant-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Paul L. Barnett, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the plaintiffs-appellants there were briefs by Andrew J. King and Lutz, Burnett, McDermott, Jahn & King, LLP, Chilton and oral argument by Andrew J. King.

A…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API