Legal Opinion
Holmes Protection of Pittsburgh, Inc. v. Port Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 9, 1985No. Appeal, No. 3571 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Appellants appeal from the order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas which sustained the preliminary objections of the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) to Appellants’ petition for appointment of viewers filed under Section 502(e) of the Eminent Domain Code (Code).1
*344Appellants, Holmes Protection of Pittsburgh, Inc. (Holmes) and Pittsburgh Fire and Protection Company (Pittsburgh Fire) own and maintain communication cable used in providing burglar alarm, fire alarm and other services to their customer®. Holme® is tíre lessee of a right-of-way…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- REDEVELOP. AUTH., PHILA. v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In re RamseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- McCracken v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- City of Philadelphia v. Airportels, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In re Condemnation of Premises 320 Crestview CircleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- McGaffic v. RED. AUTH., CITY OF N. CASTLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Darlington v. County of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- McGaffic v. Redevelopment Authority of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Millcreek Township v. N.E.A. Cross CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- German v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.