Legal Opinion
REDEVELOP. AUTH., PHILA. v. Lieberman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 18, 1975No. 518PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANDERINO, Justice.
In this appeal we must decide whether, in an eminent domain proceeding, a condemnee whose retail liquor li*211cense loses value as a result of the condemnation of the premises for which the license was issued, is entitled to have such loss considered in the award of just compensation to be paid by the condemnor.
Irwin Lieberman (condemnee) leased premises at 2-4 South Hicks Street, Philadelphia, in which he operated a licensed retail liquor establishment. The business had been operated at the same location by Lieberman and his father for thirty-five years. On…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Re Daniel Nejberger, D/B/A Piccolo's Famous Pizza and Il Pastaio Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Pennsylvania Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- 1412 Spruce, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- 21 West Lancaster Corp. v. Main Line Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Holmes Protection of Pittsburgh, Inc. v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.