Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Polk v. Bartinicki

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 2003No. 3619PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a bond estreatment case. The sole issue on appeal concerns whether the trial court erred in failing to consider the cost to the State of Henry Zbigniew Bartinicki’s failure to appear in court in ordering the estreatment of his bond. We reverse and remand.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Bartinicki was arrested and charged with trafficking in cocaine, distribution of marijuana, distribution of cocaine within the proximity of a school, and distribution of marijuana within the proximity of a school. He was released on an appearance bond in the amount $37,000, with Ned Polk, Jr., of York…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Gentry v. YonceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. HollowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. Pride v. AndersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. State v. LaraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. HINOJOSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API