State v. HINOJOS
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.
Richard G. Thompson, d/b/a All-Out Bail Bonding (All Out), and Accredited Property and Casualty Insurance (collectively, the Appellants) appeal the trial court’s estreatment of Mario Hinojos’s bond. The Appellants contend the trial court abused its discretion by modifying Hinojos’s bond without proper notice and consent. The Appellants also argue their obligations under the bond were completed at the time of Hinojos’s guilty plea. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
On August 18, 2005, Hinojos was arrested in Greenville County and Charged with trafficking methamphetamine and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Player v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- ATLANTIC WHOLESALE CO. INC. v. SolondzCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Rushing v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Melton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012