Legal Opinion

State v. Lara

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 2009No. 26745PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller

The State appeals a circuit court holding that a $13,000.00 bond issued by Respondent, A-l Bonding, was not estreated to the state. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

On November 2005, Jose Luis Lara was arrested and charged with possession with intent to distribute (PWID) cocaine, PWID cocaine within proximity of a park, and driving without a license, 3rd offense, in Easley. He was released on a $13,000.00 surety bond which was issued by A-l Bonding. On May 3, 2006, the solicitor’s office issued notices to Lara and A-l to appear for trial on Wednesday, May 17, 2006. When Lara…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HollowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  2. Pride v. AndersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. McClintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Ex Parte Polk v. BartinickiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PolicaoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API