Legal Opinion

Dutcher v. Phoenix Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Six issues are presented on this appeal. They are:

1. Did the trial court improperly deny Britt’s affidavit of prejudice ?

2. Did the trial court err when it refused to submit active negligence and apportionment questions to the jury concerning Robert Gurney’s role in the accident?

3. Did the trial court err when it found Larry Britt negligent as a matter of law ?

4. Was the trial court’s instruction concerning the immateriality of the purpose of the trip to Beloit improper ?

5. Is the $10,000 award for Clarence Dutcher’s future loss of earnings excessive ?

6. Do appellants’ brief and appendix…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lisowski v. ChenenoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Delmore v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API