Legal Opinion

Martin v. Clinton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1965No. 37984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

— Ernest S. Martin loaned to Franklin S. Clinton the sum of $4,500 to enable the latter to purchase stock in the Cadet Coach Corporation. Martin took a promissory note as evidence of this debt. The suit was upon the note.

The trial court, sitting without jury, found that the parties had made an oral agreement resulting in a complete satisfaction of the debt evidenced by the note. A judgment of dismissal was entered against plaintiff Martin, from' which he appeals.

Appellant first contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the “finding for Respondent.” Rule on Appeal 42 (a) (7),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Wilson v. ElwinWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. Dickson v. HausmanWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Caffrey v. Chem-Ionics Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Wenatchee Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mission Ridge EstatesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Northshore School District No. 417 v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API