Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Elwin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1959No. 34950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is ah appeal from a judgment awarding the respondent $1,800 for demurrage incurred • during the unloading of one of his barges and $60 for docking expenses.

The appellants did not set out verbatim in their brief the findings of fact which they claimed to be erroneous. Hence, the findings as made by the trial court must be accepted on appeal as the established facts in the- case. Rules on Appeal 42 and 43, RCW Vol. 0; Timm v. Gilliland, 53 Wn. (2d) 432, 334 P. (2d) 539.

According to these findings, on or about August 4, 1956, ■the respondent, a sole trader engaged in the business of marine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Timm v. GillilandWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ben Franklin Transp. Co. v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. Dick Chiarello & Bros. v. Central R. Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. ClintonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Iverson v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API