Legal Opinion

Curtis v. G.E. Capital Modular Space

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2005No. M2004-01304-SC-R23-CQPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ., joined.

Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1 this Court accepted certification of the following two questions from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, at Greeneville:(1) In an action instituted against an employer for workers’ compensation benefits and in which the employer files an answer or amended answer naming a third party as having caused all or a part of the plaintiffs injuries, does Tennessee Code Annotated section…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ridings v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Browder v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by54 opinions

  1. Calvin Gray Mills, Jr. v. Fulmarque, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Curtis Myers v. Amisub (SFH), Inc., d/b/a St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Biscan v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Graham v. CaplesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Evelyn Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API