Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The excise board of Comanche county made an appropriation for drag fund purposes for the fiscal year 1929-1930 for each of six townships located in said county, said appropriation in each township being of sufficient size that it required a full two-mill levy to raise the same. No itemization of the appropriation for those respective townships was made. The appropriation in each township was made in a lump sum.
It is the contention of the protestant “that it was the duty of the excise board in making the appropriation for the drag fund for each of these townships to itemize such appropriation,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grubb v. Smiley, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Protest of BledsoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.