Legal Opinion
Grubb v. Smiley, Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 10, 1929No. 19639PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the trial court, filed his petition and amended petition against the defendant in error, defendant in the trial court, as county treasurer of Tulsa county, to recover taxes paid under protest and alleged by the plaintiff to be illegal and void. For convenience, the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The tax involved in- this action is the first half of the tax for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1926.
Under date of September 20, 1929, an order of dismissal was entered in this case on stipulation of the parties dismissing the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Blake v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Going v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Lusk v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Antrim Lumber Co. v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bank of Picher v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.