Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This is an appeal by both the protestant and the excise board from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review sustaining the protest of the plaintiff in error as to some of the items protested and denying its protest as to some of the items protested. The items protested were for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1932. The cause was not briefed in this court until after the beginning of the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1933. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as protestant and protestee.
The protestant’s first contention is that there was error in denying its protest relating to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Lindeberg v. MessmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Steiner v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hise v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Polson v. PirtleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.