Legal Opinion
Klinger v. Rose
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 17, 1969No. 64 Civ. 3653PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TYLER, District Judge.
On October 1, 1968, this court denied a joint motion for summary judgment filed by defendants The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (“B&O”) and Reading Company (“Reading”). 291 F.Supp. 456 (S.D.N.Y.1968). Thereafter, on February 17, 18, 19 and 21, 1969, this action was tried before the court without a jury. On consideration of the evidence adduced at trial and the post-trial memoranda of law submitted by the parties, this opinion is filed to constitute the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 52, F.R. Civ.P.
This is a derivative action brought…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Molinas v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Ohio Valley Electric Corp. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Klinger v. RoseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
3Cited by4 opinions
- Charlotte Klinger and Eric Klinger v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and Edward C. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Fischer v. CF & I Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Charlotte Klinger and Eric Klinger v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and Edward C. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Charlotte Klinger and Eric Klinger v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and Edward C. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970