Legal Opinion
Charlotte Klinger and Eric Klinger v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and Edward C. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 30, 1970No. 398-399, Dockets 34086-34110PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, the owners of both common and preferred stock of the Reading Company, a common carrier, brought this derivative action on behalf of Reading against the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (B & O) and certain individuals who were directors of Reading in April 1963.1 Jurisdiction was properly based on Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 (1964). Plaintiffs sought trebled damages against B & O, claiming that B & O violated Section 10 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 20 (1964), when it purchased Reading’s half-interest in a jointly-owned produce terminal in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Volasco Products Co. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,291 Movielab, Inc. v. Berkey Photo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Town of Brookline v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.