Legal Opinion

Klinger v. Rose

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 1, 1968No. 64 Civ. 3653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TYLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the owners of both common and preferred stock of Reading Company (“Reading”), a common carrier, have brought this derivative action on behalf of Reading seeking treble damages from the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (“B&O”), another common carrier, and from ten individual defendants who were directors of Reading at the time of the alleged misconduct. None of the individual defendants have been served. The suit is brought under Sections 4 1 and 10 2 of the Clayton Act. The defendants B&Q and Reading 3 jointly move for summary judgment dismissing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. In Re Missouri Pac. R. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. HFH USA Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1992
  2. Klinger v. RoseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API