Legal Opinion
Fischer v. CF & I Steel Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 14, 1987No. Nos. 82 Civ. 5424 (MEL), 82 Civ. 6159 (MEL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action are former shareholders of Southern Pacific Company (“Southern Pacific”) who seek to recover treble damages from defendants CF & I Steel Corporation (“CF & I”) and Thomas M. Evans for violations of Section 10 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 20 (1982). They move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a), for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. The defendants cross-move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the amended complaint. Both motions are denied.
The basic facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fischer v. CF & I Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Fischer v. CF & I Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990