Legal Opinion

Heard v. Conrad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2000No. 98-CA-71PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waite, Judge.

This matter presents a timely appeal of summary judgment granted in favor of appellees in the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas. The trial court concluded that appellant had failed to file his occupational disease claim within the statutory period.

It is clear from the record that this matter was ripe for summary judgment as all parties agree on the following relevant facts: George Heard, appellant, voluntarily retired from his employment with the Eichleay Corporation in October 1982. On March 31, 1993, appellant was diagnosed with and began treating for asbestosis and chronic…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dombelek v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Chieffo v. Ysd Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Weisenauer v. Am. Standard, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Dombelek v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API