Dombelek v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Concurring in the judgmentDeGenaro, Judge
{¶ 54} I concur in the majority’s opinion through ¶ 27 and its ultimate conclusion. But I cannot agree with the rationale it uses when reaching that conclusion.
{¶ 55} The majority states that the three-part test to be used in order to determine when a disability due to an occupational disease begins for the purposes of the statute of limitations found in R.C. 4123.85 is an instructional guide and that it is ill-advised for this court to define what the terms used in that test mean, finding that the determination of when a disability due to an occupational disease begins is solely within the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- White v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Craddock v. Eagle Picher Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.