Legal Opinion
Beach & Bluff Conservancy v. City of Solana Beach
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 17, 2018No. D072304PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaller, Acting P. J.
*252INTRODUCTION
The California Coastal Act of 1976 ( Pub. Resources Code, 1 § 30000 et seq.) (the Coastal Act) requires local governments like defendant City of Solana Beach (the City) to develop a local coastal program (LCP). The LCP, consisting of a land use plan (LUP) and implementing ordinances, is designed to further the objectives of the Coastal Act. (§ 30001.5, subd. (c); Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los Angeles (2012) 55 Cal.4th 783, 794, 149 Cal.Rptr.3d 383, 288 P.3d 717.) The Coastal Act provides that a local government must submit its LUP to the California…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Benedetti v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Cal. Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center v. BaassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- California Manufacturers etc. v. Off. of Environmental Health etc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Citizens for South Bay Coastal Access v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Citizens for South Bay Coastal Access v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.