Stowe v. Merrilees
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J., pro tem.
This appeal is taken upon the judgment roll alone. Briefly summarizing the findings, it appears that the defendant Merrilees, for some time prior to the fall of 1932, was mining upon certain property in Calaveras County under a lease from the owners thereof. On November 15, 1932, he and the other defendants, Adams, Hopkins and Mayer, met in Los Angeles and executed limited partnership certificates pursuant to the provisions of section 2478 of the Civil Code, by the terms of Avhich the four partners agreed to carry on mining activities on said leased premises. On the same…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Levy v. LookNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dwinell's Central Neon v. Cosmopolitan Chinook HotelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Shindler v. Marr & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Hoefer v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Solomont v. Polk Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Tiburon National Bank v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.