Legal Opinion

Solomont v. Polk Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1966No. Civ. 29757PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

In May of 1959 appellant company purchased a parcel of real property in Santa Maria for cash and a deed of trust (covering the unpaid balance) which was made subordinate to a construction loan thereafter obtained in the sum of $300,000 for a 50-unit apartment building. Subsequently a “cost breakdown” submitted to the bank by appellant Rudnick certified that the total cost of construction would be $355,600. Construction of the building commenced on June 3, 1959. At or about this same time appellant Rudnick separately contacted the respondents, stating to them that he needed $80,000 to complete…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. SimmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Dwinell's Central Neon v. Cosmopolitan Chinook HotelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. American Alternative Energy Partners II v. Windridge, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API