Legal Opinion

Davis v. Sponhauer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1991No. 43A03-9010-CV-441PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Paul Davis appeals from an adverse judgment following a bench trial on Mar-vey and Beverly Sponhauer's complaint to quiet title to a disputed strip of land. Davis presents nineteen allegations of trial court error, which we consolidate and rephrase as:

I. Whether the trial court erred in concluding that the Sponhauers established title to the disputed tract by adverse possession.

II. Whether the trial court erred in concluding that the property line had been established by the agreement of the parties and their predecessors-in-interest.

III. Whether the trial court erred in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Dunn v. CadienteIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kline v. KramerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hopping v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Northern Elec. Co., Inc. v. TormaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Kukene v. GenualdoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  5. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. TishnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API