Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Tishner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1998No. 29A02-9707-CV-431PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) appeals the judgment of the trial court partially denying its request for a permanent injunction and ordering it to pay damages to Earl Jackson Tishner, Martha Germadine Tishner, Martha G. Loveall, Earlene Kay Brewster, and Elizabeth Irene Reasoner (the Tishners). Panhandle presents numerous issue on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

I. Whether the trial court erred in determining that Panhandle’s easement was partially extinguished by the Tishners’ adverse possession.

II. Whether Panhandle owed a duty to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Kline v. KramerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Lafayette Car Wash, Inc. v. BoesIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Shafer v. LambieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. MuncyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Metropolitan Development Commission v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Rehl v. BilletzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API