Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Cundiff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1989No. 32S01-8909-CV-675PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Per curiam

This case concerns the conditions under which a party or his attorney may be ordered to pay fees and costs to an opposing party for having filed or pursued a frivolous, groundless, or unreasonable claim.

Attorney Stanley Kahn filed a tort action on behalf of clients who were injured when the car in which they were passengers was sideswiped by a vehicle driven by Rachel Cundiff. Kahn sued both Rachel Cundiff and her husband Larry Cundiff, in whose name the car was titled. Kahn resisted Larry Cundiff's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and his motion for a judgment on the pleadings.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rubin v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Kellogg v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nesses v. Specialty Connectors Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Loparex, LLC v. MPI Release Technologies, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API