Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 19, 1932No. 6 Div. 932PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The original suit was commenced by Yeilding Bros. Co. Department Stores, Inc., upon a surety bond executed by the defendant, a surety company, under authority of section 28 of the Acts of 1927, page 356 et seq., known as the Highway Code.
The complaint alleged that the performance of the contract was completed December 10, 1929, and that said contract “has been completely performed and finally settled for.” It did not allege the exact date of the final settlement.. It is not necessary to do this, if its date is approximately shown and that it occurred within sixty days before the suit was…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Slayton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Connell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Riley-Stabler Construction Company, a Division of Riley Lumber & Supply Company, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Southern Ry. Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.