Legal Opinion
In re: Graham
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2013No. 13-3082PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
In 2000, Leo D. Graham pleaded guilty to one count of armed bank robbery. He did not appeal, but later he unsuccessfully sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Graham, 312 Fed.Appx. 79 (10th Cir.2008). He now moves for authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion based on Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012). We deny authorization.
Congress has placed strict limitations on second or successive § 2255 motions, requiring that a movant obtain this court’s…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- In re: Michael PerezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. VanderwerffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Rudy Liddell v.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Smith v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.