Legal Opinion

United States v. Moya

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2012No. 11-2232PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Dominic Moya, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. The district court denied the motion and rejected his application for a certificate of appealability (COA). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring a COA to appeal the denial of a § 2255 motion). He now seeks a COA from this court. We deny the application for a COA and dismiss the appeal because no reasonable jurist could debate the district court’s decision. Defendant argues that his counsel was ineffective in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Kenneth Jefferson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Kovacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Wayne Hare v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. CarriganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. In re: GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API