United States v. Michael St. Hubert
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, joined by ED CARNES, Chief Judge, and WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Two dissents-those by Judges Wilson and Martin-have seized upon this direct appeal case as an opportunity to criticize our…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Martin; Dissent · Pryor.
2Cases cited215 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Marcus WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Andrew McHaneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- St. Hubert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.