Legal Opinion

Winward v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2015No. Case No. 20130743PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1[ 1 This is Mr. Winward's second appeal in a postconviction proceeding he initiated in 2009. On his first appeal, we affirmed the dismissal of most of his claims, concluding they were barred by the statute of limitations of the Post-Conviction Remedies Act (PCRA). Winward v. State, 2012 UT 85, ¶ 28, 293 P.3d 259. But we vacated the dismissal on one narrow issue: whether the U.S. Supreme Court's new decisions in Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. GuardUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Marchet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. State, Division of Child & Family Services v. BazzelleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API