Legal Opinion

Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 1996No. C1-95-1274Published

1Opinion of the Court

552 N.W.2d 723 (1996)

David E. MALMIN and Jeanette Malmin, Respondents,

v.

MINNESOTA MUTUAL FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

No. C1-95-1274.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 5, 1996.

Eric J. Magnuson, Glen M. Goldman, Minneapolis, for Apellant.

Kay Nord Hunt, Lummer, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for Respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

Appellant Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company (Minnesota Mutual) has obtained review of a court of appeals decision in favor of respondents David and Jeanette Malmin. Answering a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API