Legal Opinion

Briggs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1992No. 91CA0126PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American), appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Valorie Briggs. In its order, the trial court found that' the consent to sue clause within Briggs’ uninsured motorist policy with American was void and that American was bound by the determination of damages in Briggs’ tort action against the uninsured motorist. We agree and therefore affirm.

In November 1987, Briggs was injured in an automobile accident caused by an uninsured motorist. Pursuant to the provisions of her uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API