Garland v. Zebold

Opinion by

JARMAN. C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Haskell county on May 25, 1919, by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages for alleged false and erroneous certificate to a certain abstract.

The plaintiff alleges, in hiy petition, that E. M. Zebold was engaged in the abstract business during the year 1916, and that his codefendants, R. A. Zebold and H. D. Price, are sureties on the abstracter’s bond of said E. M. Zebold; that on March 26. 1916, the plaintiff employed the defendant E. M. Ze-bold to make an abstract of title to a certain tract of land in…