Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank v. Adams County Abstract Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1945No. File No. 6959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurns, J.

This appeal presents two propositions for determination. The first deals with the contention of' the respondent that there is nothing for this court to review.

The case was tried to a jury and at the close of the testimony both sides moved for a directed verdict. Having done so, they consented to the discharge of the jury and upon the testimony presented the court made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and ordered judgment for the plaintiff. From the judgment the defendant appealed.

Having appealed from the judgment, appellant may have reviewed all errors appearing on the record. See Wilson…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Russell & Co. v. Polk County Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Hillock v. Idaho Title & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Schade v. GehnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Goldberg v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Corcoran v. Abstract & Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. DuPratt v. BLACK HILLS LAND AND ABSTRACT COMPANYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Corcoran v. Abstract & Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Northern Improvement Co. v. Pembina Broadcasting Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API