Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1924No. 13841PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LYONS, C.

The parties will be designated as in the court below.. This suit was brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of incompleteness and imperfections of an abstract and error made by an abstracter in compiling an abstract. The suit is brought against the abstracter and the sureties on the abstracter’s statutory bond. It appears affirmatively from the face of the plaintiff’s petition that more than three years have elapsed between the furnishing of the abstract and the filing- of the suit. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition on tlhe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryus v. GrubleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Van SlyckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Garland v. ZeboldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Close v. CoatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. People Ex Rel. Shutt v. Farmers Grain & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API