Legal Opinion

Pretzel v. Fiss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1911No. 17,031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Atchison district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

A. C. Fiss, one of the defendants, was on June 11, 1903, appointed guardian of the plaintiff, Pretzel, who had been found of unsound mind. October 27, 1903, Pretzel was by the probate court adjudged restored and Fiss was ordered removed and directed to make settlement of his account as guardian, which he claims to have done, apparently in October, 1903. July 13, 1907, Pretzel sued Fiss and the sureties on his bond for $4744.45, the value of the property alleged to have been unaccounted for and to have been wrongfully converted. The case was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryus v. GrubleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Van SlyckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Provident Loan Trust Co. v. WolcottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  5. Hawk v. SaylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Paulsen v. McKaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Garland v. ZeboldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API