Hewitt v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
In a prosecution for manufacturing prohibited liquors and the unlawful possession of a still, it was competent for the state to show that a five-gallon jug of whisky was found on the premises of the defendant, as tending to show the purpose-for which the still was to he used, and in connection with the evidence of the possession of a still as tending to connect the defendant with the manufacture of the whisky in his possession. Blackstone v. State, 19 Ala. App. 582, 99 So. 323; Edwards v. State, 19 Ala. App. 129, 95 So. 560.
It having been shown by a state’s, witness that the defendants were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Blackstone v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Camillieri v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hope v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Blakeney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
- Weeks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926