Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1924No. 2 Div. 311, 312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

In a prosecution for manufacturing prohibited liquors and the unlawful possession of a still, it was competent for the state to show that a five-gallon jug of whisky was found on the premises of the defendant, as tending to show the purpose-for which the still was to he used, and in connection with the evidence of the possession of a still as tending to connect the defendant with the manufacture of the whisky in his possession. Blackstone v. State, 19 Ala. App. 582, 99 So. 323; Edwards v. State, 19 Ala. App. 129, 95 So. 560.

It having been shown by a state’s, witness that the defendants were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Blackstone v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Camillieri v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hope v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Blakeney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Weeks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API