Camillieri v. State

In dealing with this ap- . peal for convenience we follow the assignments of error.

On cross-examination of the state’s witness Capitán, defendant’s counsel asked' this question:

“There is nothing strange about somebody bringing pecans to your store and selling them to you, is there?”

The witness had already testified fully as .to how he bought pecans, stating facts from which the jury might draw conclusions relevant to the issues, and if for no other reason even if error this ruling would not be sufficient to reverse the cause. Moreover, the question called for a conclusion of the Witness based…