Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Langmack

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1964PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff in this action for malpractice against a duly licensed physician and surgeon has appealed from a judgment for the defendant which followed a ruling of the court below sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, based upon the ground that the action is barred by the statute of limitation.

As stated in the plaintiff’s brief:

“The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a cause of action for medical malpractice, arising out of negligently leaving and failing to remove a surgical needle from plaintiff’s body, accrues at the time of the negligent act, or at the time it…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Frohs v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API