Fink v. Marr
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered April 29, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, hr an action on contract, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— The purpose of this action was to recover the sum of $277.20, the balance alleged to be due for a quantity of apples, sold and delivered. The defendant pleaded a *93breach of warranty, and prayed for the recovery of damages in the sum of $35.15. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $185.60. From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the defendant appeals.
The facts, so far as necessary to an understanding of the question here presented, are as follows: On the 28th day of October, 1912, the plaintiff sold his crop of apples for that year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Babcock v. TriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Morse v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
- Dickinson Fire & Pressed Brick Co. v. Crowe & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Tacoma Coal Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Strong v. EldridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noel v. Garford Motor Truck Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Gruendler Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co. v. Preston Grain & Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Valentine v. Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918